Thread:XXxKARMAxXx/@comment-26431461-20180924204714/@comment-26431461-20180924214613

Hi there lol. I had some points against his arguement but I decided not to use them because he wouldn't understand, and the arguement would get even worse. Is it alright if I post it here? I know at least you'll understand my points.

1) **** off

Okay, I will, but only after I explain everything.

2) My logic does not state that Pistols = Revolvers

In a way, it does. He said "Miniguns are LMG's, so there you go, the QBB97 and DP28 are technically also miniguns."

So why can't I say, "revolvers are handguns, so there you go, the M9 and 1911 are technically also revolvers"?

And plus, the wording was wrong on his part. He says that "Pistols do not equal revolvers". I mean, they could, although the more correct term would be handguns, they are both acceptable. And I didn't even use the word "pistol". I said "handgun".

3) I'm not ****ing ********, okay, ****? I know what LMG stands for.

I only had to clear up what LMG stood for for him to understand why miniguns aren't LMGs.

4) I'm being a ******bag why? Because I ****ing can.

Ok, not really. We have rules. But if you want to act that way then that's alright. I'm not really gonna be offended.

5) I'm pretty ****ing sure that you don't HOLD a SAW, because nobody can hold that, fire, and aim simultaneously.

Um yeah, that's the whole purpose of a SAW. SAW stands for "Squad Automatic Weapon". It's supposed to be a man-portable MG, unlike a minigun.

He said nobody can hold it, fire and aim simultaneously? How about this guy ? Or this madman? You can aim, fire and hold it, just like a rifle, albeit it would be much heavier. That's what it was designed for. Plus, the extra weight of the gun will just help dampen the recoil. You just need to be strong enough to hold it, like you said.

And that's also why you fire in short bursts, not expend your whole magazine at once.

Of course, it's much more practical to use it as a mounted weapon, but it is definitely possible, and also practical to use an M249 as a handheld weapon.

6) I made a mistake, so my bad, but you don't have to act like I'm a complete autist, because you just seem like you have a superiority complex and is also a know-it-all *** that gets beat up by noodle armed nerds.

Yes, he made a mistake, but he seems like the one making an even bigger deal out of it. If he had responded with "dude, I know. Don't be such a jerk (which I really wasn't being, but whatever)." I would have apologized for my "jerkiness" and moved on. But after his reaction, I'm just gonna see him (and I'm sure others will) as that jerk who overreacted over a comment, even though he has done worse in the past.

Also, what if I am that noodle-armed nerd? Checkmate.

7) What kind of Machinegun doesn't need a lot of ammo?

Yes, machine guns need a lot of ammo. But does he realize how much more ammo an M134 needs than an M249? It's a minigun. Miniguns fire fast. Firing fast = needing more ammo to keep a sustained level of fire, whether it be in bursts or just going full Rambo mode.

An M249 needs around 100 - 200 rounds.

A minigun probably needs 500 - 800. That's not too much in comparison, but then there's the point that you also need a source of power. But this whole part is still irrelevant.

Actually no it's not. It was to point out that a minigun is not "light".

8) Don't bother to reply, because you're not worth my time.

I mean I was going to apologize, but seeing that he's gonna be this way, okay. If he's not gonna accept it then that's fine.

Thanks for reading. Sorry that it had to go so downhill.